The investment crowdfunding landscape can be confusing.

And one of the main reasons it's so confusing is because many of the key terms and labels were created by lawyers and legislators, who aren't really known for their ability to keep things simple. 

That means navigating and deciphering the nearly inscrutable alphabet soup of the relevant crowdfunding regulations, rules, laws, and requirements is about as much fun as …. well, navigating and deciphering an alphabet soup of laws, rules, and regulations.

So before trying to parse the fine print of crowdfunding regulations, here’s some overall context that should help.

In 2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (get it? “JOBS”? Isn’t that clever…) was signed into law, and it did two important things:

  1. Amended the Securities Act of 1933 (that's the set of laws passed after the 1929 stock market crash)
  2. Required the SEC to update several of its Regulations

It’s helpful to think about crowdfunding regulations by keeping in mind these JOBS Act sections: Title II, Title III, and Title IV. Each one has quite a few twists and turns if you dig deeper, but at a high level, the following should be enough to help you understand quite a bit about the platforms and investments you’ll come across as you learn more about the investment crowdfunding ecosystem:

Title II Crowdfunding (aka “Reg D”)

This one is barely “crowdfunding” as most people think about it; it’s basically just updating the 1933-era restrictions on how private companies could raise money to reflect the realities of the 21st century, especially the Web. The main change is that now private companies can in some cases “generally solicit” investors (meaning advertise and have websites and stuff), but they have to make sure that a person who actually invests is an “accredited investor” and meets specific income or net worth criteria.

Title II is why you now hear ads on the radio starting with “Attention accredited investors…” This part of the JOBS Act was the first of these three to go into effect (all the way back in 2013), so is the most mature part of the ecosystem. Many of the "crowdfunding" platforms you’ve heard of so far probably fit under Title II.

  • Examples: FundersClub, MicroVentures, EquityMultiple, YieldStreet , and AngelList
  • The fine print: As a result of Title II, the SEC updated “Rule 506” of their “Regulation D” to now include two parts, “Rule 506(b)” and “Rule 506(c)”. The nuance between those two isn't important for now.

Title III Crowdfunding (aka “Reg CF” or "Regulation Crowdfunding")

This one is real “crowdfunding”, in the sense that anyone can invest in them, and all of the advertising and notifications about them must happen on the internet. Often the investment minimums are quite small (often $50 or less), and the intent of Title III was clearly to “democratize” raising capital, especially for small businesses (the maximum amount that can be raised under Title III is currently $5M, though it’s possible to do a “parallel” funding using Title II at the same time, which has no maximum). Title III is why you now see ads online to invest $50 in food trucks, breweries, or steak delivery.

  • Examples: MainVest , Republic, Wefunder, StartEngine
  • The fine print: As a result of Title III, the SEC created a new Regulation, Regulation “CF” (get it? CF? for Crowd Funding? Isn’t that clever…)

Title IV Crowdfunding (aka “Reg A+”)

Title IV is the most byzantine part of the story, and includes two separate tiers (Tier 1 and Tier 2, natch). While Title III suits genuine “startup” companies (the proverbial guys or gals in a garage), Title IV is actually geared more toward companies a bit further along, who want to raise money from the general public (including non-accredited investors), but are not yet ready for a true IPO and listing on a stock market. (Some even refer to Title IV offerings as “mini-IPOs”.) Although it’s abstruse, Title IV has proven quite flexible, spawning a range of creative investment products, including REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts) from platforms like Fundrise, RealtyMogul, and Streitwise. While it’s been active longer than Title III, the ramp up has been slower for Title IV, in part because of the deal sizes (up to $50M), but Title IV may eventually overtake every other form of fundraising for later-stage and growth companies.

  • Examples: Fundrise, MasterWorks , FranShares
  • The fine print: As a result of Title IV, the SEC updated its Regulation A (now commonly referred to as “A+”), and defined two classes of offerings, Tier 1 and Tier 2

There’s enough detail in the weeds of all three of these to fill a book on crowdfunding regulations (literally!), but this should give you a high-level overview to make a bit more sense of the alphabet soup out there. If you want more, there’s some great stuff from the folks at SeedInvest, an exhaustive overview (and an attempt to debunk some common misconceptions) over at StartupGrind, and David M. Freedman and Matthew R. Nutting have posted a free supplement to their book that includes a lot of helpful detail by itself.

Phew! That was a lot. Take a break, you've earned it!


Get alternative-investor education, news and resources -- along with notable investment offerings -- delivered right to your inbox. Sign up for the YieldTalk newsletter


Register for FREE to comment or continue reading this article. Already registered? Login here.



Manny Amadeo Manny Amadeo 6/6/2023

Succinctly stated!